HONESTY – INTEGRITY - TRUST

A NUMBER OF OUR COUNCILLORS ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION BY IBAC. TO RESTORE HONESTY, INTEGRITY AND TRUST, I WANT TO SEE THE COUNCIL BE MORE ACCOUNTABLE, TRANSPARENT AND CONSULTATIVE.

Authorised by:  David Wright 2 Orr St., Strathmore 3041

Good Governance

“Transparency, accountability and consultation are key for good governance. Anything else is political spin and dogma.”

“Your opinion is what matters”.

I want to see the council follow the principles of good governance.

What is Good Governance?

Good Governance is transparency, accountability and consultation.

Politicians have forgotten – you appoint them to be your manager – not your master.

Why is good governance important?

  • It promotes policies more in tune with the desires and wishes of the residents/ratepayers.
  • It leads to more efficient business practices.
  • It minimises corruption and corrupt practices.

Transparency

No more hiding behind commercial and in confidence.

All council matters should be open to public scrutiny and comment.

Within the limits of the law I will be pushing to make everything openly available – and where the law imposes limits I will be fighting to have the law changed. The City of Moonee Valley is YOUR city. You have the right and are entitled to know everything affecting your city.

Accountability

Accountability – an overused word and an underused concept. The State Government – Local Government Authority has produced a list of KPI’s (Key Performance Indicators). These indicators should focus the council on what it should be trying to achieve for the betterment of its residents. 

Using these indicators I (and you) can monitor performance of the council and hold it accountable for that performance. Currently, performance against these KPI’s is reported annually. I will be pushing to have them reported quarterly.

Consultation

The City of Moonee Valley is failing its Consultative KPI (key performance indicator). Put simply, the council is not consulting you sufficiently on core services (Family, Recreation, Community, Culture, Roads, Town Planning, Rubbish) or on initiatives outside its core services.

I will strengthen the consultation process.

For initiatives outside these core services council has no mandate from you. If there are proposals to change names, remove icons, support fringe groups, pass politically based resolutions and so forth, I will encourage the council to extensively consult with you, the residents/ratepayers before agreeing to or opposing any such proposals. This consultation could range from sampling a representative but small group through to a full distribution of voting documents (Direct Democracy).

Your opinion is what matters.

Direct Democracy – Taking the Politics out of Council and Strengthening the Consultation Process.

In the 2022-2023 Annual Report the council failed the consultation KPI. I would be looking to strengthen this consultation process.

Proposals outside of the council’s mandate should go through a very defined and rigorous process.

  • Prepare a Discussion Paper describing the proposal and include initial arguments for and against – no doubt there will be councillors in favour of the proposal and no doubt councillors against. Both groups should prepare the respective initial arguments.
  • Publish the Discussion Paper and invite public comment. This public comment should expand on the arguments for and against. The councillors for and against the proposal should distil the public comment and resubmit updated arguments for and against.
  • Republish the updated Discussion Paper and conduct a survey to gauge public sentiment either for or against the proposal. Based on the results of the survey either abandon or adopt the proposal. Without going in to specific design details, the survey could range from sampling a representative but small group through to a full distribution of voting documents (Direct Democracy)

 

Example: Moreland Council  recently changed its city name from Moreland to Merri-bec.  There was nothing wrong with the proposal however the process totally lacked transparency and appropriate consultation with the community. The cost and inconvenience of the change was not clearly and accurately presented and only a small, biased survey was performed. I quite like the name Merri-bec. That is not my argument. My concern is that without due process the will of the majority of residents / rate payers may / may not have been followed.

Liveable Cities

“Liveable Cities are build around the needs of the residents, not the ideology of the day.”

20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS – CLEAN GREEN NIRVANA or DYSTOPIAN ORWELLIAN CONTROL?

The MVCC has signed up to the State Government’s 20- minute neighbourhood initiative. I have grave concerns about this initiative. Although on a cursory view  the proposal sounds laudable, on closer inspection there are serious potential problems.

20 minute neighbourhoods are an urban planning concept where everything a resident needs can be accessed within a 20-minute journey (walking, riding bicycles, public transport). Sometimes they are referred to as 15 minute cities.

The following link provides an analysis of the pro’s and cons of the 20-minute neighbourhood.

https://www.spaciable.io/blog/truman-neighbourhoods-exploring-the-positives-and-challenges-of-the-15-minute-city-model

My concerns are the emphasis placed on walking; bike riding and public transport and limiting the use of the automobile. The problems with this approach are:

  • It divides the city into a series of small villages
  • It disadvantages older residents and younger residents with families (why should you be discouraged from using the car to pick up groceries or take your children to swim lessons? And worse – difficulties, restrictions and obstacles put in your way to discourage car use)
  • It discourages specialised and vibrant precincts (large shopping hubs, entertainment precincts such as Puckle St, Keilor Rd. Mt Alexander Rd., recreation precincts such as Maribyrnong River; Boeing reserve, Riverside)

LIVEABLE CITIES

Liveable Cities provide an amenable attractive environment, an abundance of public and green spaces; access to amenities; vibrance and culture; and convenient connection to other regions. They are build around the needs of the residents, not the ideology of the day.